ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPORTS INFRASTRUCTURE AND PARTICIPATION IN MASS SPORTS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE

Authors

  • А.А. Yussuf Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • A.V. Averin Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Е.В. Брагина

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25806/uu9-22021606-612

Keywords:

physical culture, mass sports, infrastructure, sports facilities, physical activity, health

Abstract

Encouraging the participation of the population in physical culture and sports is one of the priorities of the state, which is interested in healthy youth and the nation, the growth of national sports achievements. State programs in the field of mass sports development postulate the importance of physical activity for a healthy lifestyle and the need to invest in infrastructure, comprehensive information and social support for the population. In order to develop measures to improve the effectiveness of investments carried out within the framework of federal targeted programs, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the level of participation in sports and sports infrastructure. The purpose of the article is to identify the determinants and limitations of the use of sports infrastructure for the participation of citizens in physical culture and mass sports. The study was conducted using a systematic approach, as well as the analysis of literary sources, synthesis, generalization. The results of the analysis contribute to the development of the theory of sports management in terms of expanding the understanding of the factors that determine the population's physical culture and participation in various sports. The identified limitations for the use of mass sports infrastructure (measured objectively and subjectively) can be taken into account when developing state policy in the field of support and development of sports infrastructure, as well as used to improve methods for evaluating the effectiveness of public investments in this area of financing.

References

Bács Z., Bácsné Bába É. Sportkoncepció és szervezeti megvalósítása a Debreceni Egyetemen. Magyar Sporttudományi Szemle XI: Magyar Sporttudományi Kongresszus. 2014. vol. 18. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://mstt.hu/wp-content/uploads/MSSZ_201402.pdf (дата обращения: 11.08.2021).

Распоряжением Правительства Российской Федерации от 24 ноября 2020 г. № 3081-р «Об утверждении Стратегии развития физической культуры и спорта в Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года». [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://static.government.ru/media/files/Rr4JTrKDQ5nANTR1Oj29BM7zJBHXM05d.pdf (дата обращения: 13.08.2021).

Hallmann K., Wicker P., Breuer Ch., Schönherr L. Understanding the importance of sport infrastructure for participation in different sports-findings from multi-level modeling. European Sport Management Quarterly. 2012. vol. 12. P. 525–544.

Chen Sh. Sport policy evaluation: what do we know and how might we move forward? International journal of sport policy and politics. 2018. vol. 12 (4). Р. 741–759.

Downward P., Riordan J. Social interactions and the demand for sport: An economic analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy. 2007. vol. 25 (4). P. 518–537.

Солнцев И., Осокин Н., Власов А. Финансирование спорта: зарубежная практика // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2019. № 1. С. 67–74.

Wicker P., Breuer C., Pawlowski T. Promoting sport for all to age-specific target groups: The impact of sport infrastructure. European sport management quarterly. 2009. vol. 9 (2). P. 103–118.

Duncan M.J., Spence J.C., Mummery W.K. Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity. 2005. vol. 2 (11). P. 19.

Pawlowski T., Breuer C., Wicker P., Poupaux S. Travel time spending behaviour in recreational sports: An econometric approach with management implications. European sport management quarterly. 2009. vol. (3). P. 215–242.

Eyler A.A., Brownson R.C., Bacak S.J., Housemann R.A. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2003. vol. 35 (9). P. 1529–1536.

Li Ch., Ju P. Recreation Spatial Equity: An Empirical Study Based on Residents’ Experience in Shenzhen. Current Urban Studies. 2020. vol.8 (2). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: Recreation Spatial Equity: An Empirical Study Based on Residents’ Experience in Shenzhen (scirp.org) (дата обращения: 08.08.2021).

Lera-Lo´pez F., Rapu´n-Ga´rate M. The demand for sport: Sport consumption and participation models. Journal of Sport Management. 2007. vol. 21 (1). P. 103–122.

Чернобровкина E.A. Особенности финансирования физической культуры и спорта в Pоссии и за рубежом // Вестник Университета им. Е. А. Кутафина. 2019. № 7 (59). С. 63–70.

Akhmetshina E.R., Ignatjeva O.A., Ablaev I.M. Tendencies and prospects of public-private partnership development in the field of physical culture and sport. European research studies journal. 2017. vol. 20. P. 422–430.

Бобровский Е.А. О развитии финансирования физической культуры и спорта // АНИ: экономика и управление. 2020. № 4 (33). С. 71–74.

Гунаре М.Л., Поздняков К.К., Аверин А.В., Иванова Ю.О. Маркетинг территории как инструмент формирования инвестиционной привлекательности регионов // Экономические науки. 2019. № 174. С. 129–137.

Published

2021-09-21

Issue

Section

Economic theory, management and other research