EVOLUTION OF APPROACHES TO QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY AS FUNDAMENTAL ELEMENTS OF EFFICIENCY AND COMPETITIVENESS OF MODERN ENTERPRISES IN FOREIGN LITERATURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/uu6-32022562-567Статья поступила в редакцию: 15.06.2022
Статья принята к публикации: 27.06.2022
Статья опубликована: 04.07.2022
Keywords:
quality, competitiveness, efficiency, productivityAbstract
The concepts of quality and productivity can mislead specialists, students, researchers as they are sometimes used by experts as synonyms, both in industry and in scientific circles. This study demonstrates the analysis of foreign authors who have studied these concepts or a separate way of research or in combination both. Also, the article presents the evolution of these concepts is determined these concepts or a separate way of research or in combination both. Also, the article presents the evolution of these concepts is determined in chronological order by grouping the main achievements in different time frames.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Abraham B. George Box: A Source of Inspiration for Quality and Productivity. Quality Engineering. 2020. V. 22 (2). P. 103-109.
Calabrese A., Spadoni A. Quality versus productivity in service production systems: an organizational analysis. International Journal of Production Research. 2019. V. 51 (22). P. 6594- 6606.
Calabrese A. Service productivity and service quality: A necessary trade-off? International Journal of Production Economics. 2020. V. 135. P. 800–812.
Elshennawy A.K. Quality in the New Age and the Body of Knowledge for Quality Engineers. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 2018. V. 15 (5-6). P. 603-614.
Everett E.A., Hershauer J.C., Ruch W.A. Developing Quality Productivity Ratios for Public Sector Personnel Service. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Public Productivity Review. 1981. V. 5 (1). P. 45- 61.
Gill J. Quality follows quality: add quality to the business and quality will multiply the profits. The TQM Journal. 2009. V. 21 (5). P. 530-539.
Gitlow H.S. Planning for quality, productivity, and competitive position. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1991. P. 53-91.
Hart M.K., Hart R.F. Quantitative methods for quality and productivity improvement. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press, 1995. P. 5-9.
Holweg M. The Genealogy of Lean Production. Journal of Operations Management. 2007. V. 25 (2). P. 420–437.
Khan M.R.R., Darrab I.A. Development of analytical relation between maintenance, quality, and productivity. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 2017. V. 24 (3-4). P. 397-419.
Sumanth D.J., Arora D.P.S. State-of-the-art on linkage between quality, quality costs and productivity. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology. 1992. V. 7 (2).
Tangen S. Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2019. V. 54 (1). P. 34-46.
