REVIEW OF THE THERICAL CONCEPTS OF EXCHANGE «FOLLOWER- LEADER» IN A TEAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/uu8-32022403-412Статья поступила в редакцию: 14.08.2022
Статья принята к публикации: 30.08.2022
Статья опубликована: 12.09.2022
Keywords:
Leader-Member exchange theory, psychological factors of labor productivity, one-dimensional view of the relationship between leader and follower, management as a social bond, X and Y management styles, relationship between management style and labor productivity growth, leadership capital.Abstract
There are many factors of labor productivity and conditions for its increase. The main factors of labor productivity include the skills and abilities of workers, technical working conditions, labor safety conditions, scientific and technological progress. However, the use of these factors often turns out to be insufficient, since the highly effective use of production factors for increasing labor productivity can be hindered by inadequate positioning of the manager and his subordinate in the production process. The purpose of the article is to trace the evolution of the views of economic, psychological and sociological literature on the relationship between a leader and a subordinate in a work team and a social group, as well as the influence of the "Leader-Follower" interaction on the employee's attitude to work.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Bales R.F. Task role and social roles in problem solving groups. In book: Hartly E.L., Maccoby E. E., T.M. Newcomb and Hartley E.L (Eds.). Readings in social psychology. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1958. P. 437-447.
Allport G.W. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, London, Sidney. Addison-Wesly Publishing Company, 1954. 537 p.
Махаматов Т.М. Диалектика принципа демократического централизма и гражданского общества // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2015. Вып. 3. C. 151-159.
Polanyi K. The Great Transformation. Boston, Beacon Press, 1944. 357 p.
Homans G.C. Human Group. New York, Burlingame, Harcourt, Brace and World, 1950. 524 p.
Goldner A.W. The norm reciprocity: A preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review. 1960. Vol. 25. No 2. P. 161-178.
Thibau J.W., Kelly H.M. The Social Psychology of Groups. Los Angeles, University of Californi, 1959. 338 p.
House R.J. A path goal model of leader effectiveness. Admistrative Science Quqrtely. 1971, No 16. P. 321-338.
Evanse M.G. The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1970. No 5 (3). P. 277-298. DOI: 10.10016/0030-5073.
Vroom V. Work and Motivation. New York. John Wiley. 1964. 331 p.
Graen G.B., Cashman J.F. A role-making Model in Formal Organization: a Development approach. In book: Hunt J.G., and L.L. Larson (eds). Leadership Frontiers. Ohio, Kent. Kent State University Press. 1975. P. 143-165.
Dasereau F., Graen G., Haga W.J. A vertical dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership with formal Organizations. Organizational Behavior and human Performance. 1975. No 13. P. 46-78. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7.
Vecchio R. P.Theoretical and empirical examination of cognitive resource theory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1990. No 75 (2). P. 141-147.
Petrash I. Dow’s Journy to knowledge value management culture. European Management Joernal. 1996. No 14 (4). P. 365-373.
Edvinsson L.,Malone M.S. Intellectual capital. London: Piatkus, 1997. 248 p.
Henriques P.L. Werbel J., Curado C. Leader’s Human Capital as an Alternative for Relational Leadership. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing. 2014. No 5. P. 560-574.
Blau P.M. Wemiana iżycu spolecznym (przel.A.Psuty-Zajac. P.Zajac). Krakow. Zakjlad Wydawniczy Nomos, 2009. 318 р.
Найденов Н.Д. Господствующая форма экономической связи при социализме (основы критики ревизионистских концепций) // Вестник Ленинградского университета. Серия философии, экономики и права. 1976. № 1. C. 27-33.
Польщикова Е.И., Одаренко Т.Е. Стили управления в менеджменте: их преимущества недостатки // Таврический научный обозреватель. 2016. № 12 (17). C. 94-97.
Faruks S.A. The mediating effect of Leader-Member Exchange on the relationship between theory X and Y management styles and affective commitment: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Management and Organization. 2012. No 18 (2). Р. 159-174.
