MODERN TRENDS OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS OF THE "NEW WAVE"

Authors

  • L.A. Ramenskaya Ural State University of Economics
  • D.S. Voronov UMMC Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25806/uu12-32022778-784

Статья поступила в редакцию: 11.12.2022

Статья принята к публикации: 20.12.2022

Статья опубликована: 30.12.2022

Keywords:

project management, , professional standards, Agile, project manager

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and describe trends in the transformation of project management through the analysis of professional standards. Research objectives: highlight the features of the development of the main "waves" of professional project management standards; determine the prerequisites for the development of a new "wave" of professional standards; identification and analysis of common features inherent in the professional standards of the "new wave". The information base of this study was the international professional standards of project management. The main research method is the contextual analysis of the texts of the standards. The article defines the trends of professional project management, which identified based on the analysis of texts of professional standards. These include a statement of the plurality of approaches to project management, refusal to describe processes in favor of describing key principles and management practices, the growth of the importance of the project environment, the increase in the influence and responsibility of the project manager, the growth of the importance of high-level (strategic) project management. Examples from professional standards texts support each characteristic. The conclusion summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the considered professional project management standards.

Информация о публикации

Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.

Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.

Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.

Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».

Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML

References

Schneider P. Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Review of Managerial Science. 2018. vol. 12. no. 3. P. 803-848.

Balaban S., Đurašković J. Agile project management as an answer to changing environment. Eur. Proj. Manag. J. 2021. vol. 11. P. 12-19.

Manifesto for Agile Software Development. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: agilemanifesto.org (дата обращения: 30.11.2022).

Dikert K., Paasivaara M., Lassenius C. Challenges and Success Factors for Large-Scale Agile Transformations: A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Systems & Software. 2016. vol. 119. P. 87-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013.

A Snapshot of the Use of the Agile Delivery in Central Government: Review. 2012 // National Audit Office. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.nao.org.uk/report/a-snapshot-of-the-use-of-agile-delivery-in-central-government-4 (дата обращения: 30.11.2022).

Дерюшкин А. Что такое Agile-подход и зачем он нужен бизнесу? // Scrum Trek. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://scrumtrek.ru/blog/chto-takoe-agile-podhod-i-zachem-on-nuzhen-biznesu/ (дата обращения: 30.11.2022).

Schwaber K., Sutherland J. The Scrum Guide The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game/ [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf (дата обращения: 2.12.2022).

Wood M. Why You’re Confusing Frameworks with Methodologies/ [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.projectmanagement.com/contentPages/article.cfm?ID=278600&thisPageURL=/articles/278600/why-you-re-confusing-frameworks-with-methodologies#_=_. (дата обращения: 2.12.2022).

Status Quo (Scaled) Agile 2020. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.process-and-project.net/studien/studienunterseiten/status-quo-scaled-agile-2020-en/ (дата обращения: 30.11.2022).

Gemino A., Blaize H.R., Serrador P.M. Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: is hybrid a poor second choice? Project Management Journal. 2021. vol. 52. no. 2. P. 161-175.

P3.express. Online Manual. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://p3.express/ (дата обращения: 2.12.2022).

Полковников А. Ключевые изменения в стандарте по управлению проектами ISO 21502:2020 «Руководство по проектному менеджменту». [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://pmpractice.ru/download/2021_PolkovnikovAV.pdf (дата обращения: 1.12.2022).

Kyriakogkonas P., Garefalakis A., Pappa E., Kagias P. Sustainable Project Management under the Light of ESG Criteria: A Theoretical Approach. Theoretical Economics Letters. 2022. vol. 12. P. 1517-1538. DOI:10.4236/tel.2022.126083.

Moehler R.C., Hope A.J., Algeo C.T. Sustainable Project Management: Revolution or Evolution? Academy of Management Proceedings. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.13583abstract (дата обращения: 2.12.2022).

Maltzman R., Shirley D.Green project management. CRC Press, 2010. 296 p. DOI: 10.1201/EBK1439830017.

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Economic theory, management and other research