ANALYSIS OF THE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE DIGITALIZATION OF THE STATE POLICY OF THE REGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25806/uu42023159-166Статья поступила в редакцию: 21.03.2023
Статья принята к публикации: 04.04.2023
Статья опубликована: 12.04.2023
Keywords:
public administration, digitalization, artificial intelligence, information system, government programs, public policyAbstract
The formation and implementation of public policy has a key influence on most sectors of the economy and the socio-economic development of territories and the country as a whole. Under the conditions of macroeconomic instability, the amount of data on the factors and events that need to be taken into account in the formation of public policy increases. In addition, society's demand for the quality of public functions is increasing. In this regard, the need to introduce artificial intelligence technologies into practice is obvious. The purpose of the study is to analyze the institutional support of digitalization of public policy at the regional level of government and to develop a model of digital communications, aimed at improving the efficiency of formation and implementation of public policy (on the example of St. Petersburg). The object of the research is the system of public administration. The subject - technologies using artificial intelligence, used in the design and implementation of public policy. In the course of the study we analyzed regulatory legal acts, the purpose of which was to take measures to develop and / or implement into operation state information systems. As a result of the analysis it was found that there are plans to develop an information system to automate the process of formation and implementation of state projects. However, the event providing for the development of such a tool has been cancelled. The functions of the systems "Electronic Budget" and "Typical Cloud Solution for Automation of Control (Supervision) Activities" were analyzed as possible analogues, and their limited applicability in the formation and implementation of public policy was revealed. At the same time, the analysis of the quality of formation and implementation of state programs has revealed the presence of obvious problems with their formation. As a result, the conclusion about the limited institutional support for the formation and implementation of public policy was formulated, which negatively affects the quality of public administration not only at present, but also in subsequent periods. Proposals aimed at solving the problem of digitalization of public policy through the development of institutional support for the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies in the practice of public administration were formulated.
Информация о публикации
Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.
Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.
Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.
Правообладатель: Издательский дом «Академический».
Лицензия: Статья распространяется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML
References
Курникова М.В. Реализация региональной промышленной политики в условиях цифровизации экономики // Славянский форум. 2019. № 3(25). С. 298-305.
Минцифры лишили информсистемы стоимостью почти в 1 миллиард. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/2021-08-13_mintsifry_lishilos_informsistemy (дата обращения 01.03.2023).
Усков В. С. Проблемы формирования государственной промышленной политики в условиях цифровизации экономики // Экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. Т. 13. №. 6. С. 134-151.
Afonasova M.A. et al. Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 2019. V. 19. DOI:10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02.
Bon V. The digitalization–economic growth relationship in developing countries and the role of governance. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business. 2021. V. 68. № 4. P. 481-493.
Buica M. New Industrial Policy or New Industrial Revolution for Increasing European Competitiveness. Journal of Business Economics and Information Technology. 2016. V. 2. № 3. P. 8-19.
Canetta L., Barni A., Montini E. Development of a digitalization maturity model for the manufacturing sector. 2018 ieee international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, 2018. P. 1-7.
Febiri F., Hub M. Digitalization of Global Economy: A Qualitative Study Exploring Key Indicators Use to Measure Digital Progress in the Public Sector. SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021. V. 92. P. 05006.
Huijing Z. The essence of e-government and its relevance in the context of digitalization // Актуальні проблеми та перспективи розвитку обліку, аналізу та контролю в соціально-орієнтованій системі управління підприємством: Матеріали ІІІ Всеукраїнської науково-практичної конференції. м. Полтава, 31 березня 2020 року. Полтава, 2020. 474 с.
Maniam A. Digitalization and Public Policy—Conceptualizing a New Space. Redesigning Organizations. Springer, Cham, 2020. P. 193-206.
Mayer J. Digitalization and industrialization: Friends or foes. Research Paper. 2018. V. 25. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg-Mayer-6/publication/328232540_Digitalization_and_industrialization_friends_or_foes/links/5bc04d34458515a7a9e2c82b/Digitalization-and-industrialization-friends-or-foes.pdf (дата обращения 12.03.2023).
Muminov N.G., Zakhirova G.M. The role of public procurement in the digitalization of the economy and adoption of e-commerce // Научно-технические ведомости Санкт-Петербургского государственного политехнического университета. Экономические науки. 2020. Т. 13. № 2. С. 30-39. DOI: 1018721/JE.13203.
Stetsyunich Y., Busheneva Y., Zaytsev A. Framing public financial policy: transforming the classic concept in the time of digitalization. Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy. 2019. P. 1-6. DOI: 10.1145/3372177.3373289.
Williamson B. Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and ‘learning to code’. Critical Policy Studies. 2016. V. 10. № 1. P. 39-58.
